By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
AdkhabarAdkhabarAdkhabar
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Automobile
  • Entertainment
  • Esports
  • Food
  • Health
  • Life Style
  • News
  • Technology
  • Travel
Reading: CLASS ACTION AUTHORIZED AGAINST CANADA ALLEGING UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF “EMPLOYER-TYING MEASURES”(1) IMPOSED ON TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS, INCLUDING EMPLOYER-SPECIFIC OR “CLOSED” WORK PERMITS
Share
Font ResizerAa
AdkhabarAdkhabar
  • Home
  • Automobile
  • Entertainment
  • Esports
  • Food
  • Health
  • Life Style
  • News
  • Technology
  • Travel
Search
  • Home
  • Automobile
  • Entertainment
  • Esports
  • Food
  • Health
  • Life Style
  • News
  • Technology
  • Travel
Follow US
Adkhabar > Blog > News > CLASS ACTION AUTHORIZED AGAINST CANADA ALLEGING UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF “EMPLOYER-TYING MEASURES”(1) IMPOSED ON TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS, INCLUDING EMPLOYER-SPECIFIC OR “CLOSED” WORK PERMITS
CLASS ACTION AUTHORIZED AGAINST CANADA ALLEGING UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF “EMPLOYER-TYING MEASURES”(1) IMPOSED ON TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS, INCLUDING EMPLOYER-SPECIFIC OR “CLOSED” WORK PERMITS
News

CLASS ACTION AUTHORIZED AGAINST CANADA ALLEGING UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF “EMPLOYER-TYING MEASURES”(1) IMPOSED ON TEMPORARY FOREIGN WORKERS, INCLUDING EMPLOYER-SPECIFIC OR “CLOSED” WORK PERMITS

Last updated: 29/06/2025 5:37 AM
Published: 29/06/2025
Share
SHARE

MONTREAL, June 28, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — On September 13, 2024, the Superior Court of Québec authorized the Association for the Rights of Household and Farm Workers to institute a class action against the Attorney General of Canada.

- Advertisement -

The Association argues that “employer-tying measures”1 imposed on temporary foreign workers2, including employer-specific work permits or “closed” work permits, breach sections 7 and 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Association asks that certain provisions of the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations be declared unconstitutional, and that Charter damages (monetary compensation) be paid to all members of the class action.

- Advertisement -

The Attorney General of Canada contests the merits of the class action, which will be determined by a trial to be scheduled at a later time.

- Advertisement -

A person is automatically a member of this class action IF they worked in Canada after April 17, 1982 without having been a Canadian citizen or a permanent resident of Canada at the time, AND IF they meet at least one (1) of the following conditions:

- Advertisement -
  • They were issued a work permit which included the condition of working for a specific employer (or group of employers) or at a specific employer’s workplace (or group of workplaces):
    • They meet this condition if they were hired through the Temporary Foreign Workers Program (TFWP), the Seasonal Agricultural Worker Program (SAWP) or the Non-Immigrant Employment Authorization Program (NIEAP).
    • They also meet this condition if they were hired through the International Mobility Program (IMP) or another immigration stream or program and their work permit included the condition of working for a specific employer (or group of employers) or at a specific employer’s workplace (or group of workplaces).

OR

- Advertisement -
  • They were authorized to work in Canada without a work permit because they were employed by a foreign entity on a short-term basis, or because they were employed in a personal capacity by an individual who was not a Canadian citizen or permanent resident. This category:
    • includes domestic workers, personal assistants or caregivers (nannies or au pair) who entered Canada along with their employers, or to join their employers for a short-term in Canada;
    • includes accredited domestic workers employed in a personal capacity by certain foreign representatives, such as ambassadors, high commissioners, heads of international organizations, special representatives, or individuals occupying similar positions;
    • does not include individuals who were employed by a foreign State or other foreign entity to work at an embassy, a high commission, a consulate, a permanent delegation to a United Nations agency, or a special representative office;
    • does not include individuals employed by the United Nations, its agencies or an international organization of which Canada is a member.

Individuals who meet those criteria are automatically included in the class action. They are not required to do anything further to become members of the class action. They will never have to pay legal costs arising from the class action.

- Advertisement -

If a person does not want to be included in the class action, they may opt out of the class action by August 27, 2025 at 4:30 PM at the latest. The means of opting out and the consequences of doing so are explained in the detailed notice to members of the class action:

- Advertisement -

https://www.registredesactionscollectives.quebec/fr/Consulter/ApercuDemande?NoDossier=500-06-001263-231

- Advertisement -

1 The Attorney General of Canada contests the qualification of the challenged provisions as “employer-tying measures”, which comes from the Association’s allegations and the authorization judgment.

2 Sometimes referred to as migrant workers.

 

- Advertisement -

View original content:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/class-action-authorized-against-canada-alleging-unconstitutionality-of-employer-tying-measures1-imposed-on-temporary-foreign-workers-including-employer-specific-or-closed-work-permits-302486384.html

- Advertisement -
NYSE Content Advisory: Pre-Market Update + BETA Technologies Ends First Day of Trading Higher
Pioneering Crypto Life Insurer Anthea Raises US$22 Million in Series A Funding
Orion Corporation: Disclosure Under Chapter 9 Section 10 of the Securities Market Act (BlackRock, Inc.)
IBM and Cisco Announce Plans to Build a Network of Large-Scale, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computers
From Trading to Empowerment: HTX Unveils 2025 Mid-Year Performance and Strategic Roadmap
TAGGED:“employer-tyingactionagainstallegingauthorizedcanadaclassclosedemployer-specificforeignimposedincludingmeasures”(1)newspermitstemporaryunconstitutionalityworkworkers
Share This Article
Facebook Email Print
- Advertisement -

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
FacebookLike
XFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!
Popular News
REPLUS Engitech Powers India’s Energy Future with RE5K Launch at REI Expo
News

REPLUS Engitech Powers India’s Energy Future with RE5K Launch at REI Expo

30/10/2025
Tsinghua University Releases the First University-Wide Framework Governing AI in Teaching and Research
HarperCollins India to publish Gaur Gopal Das’s new book You Can Have It All
slice launches flagship credit card and India’s first UPI-Powered Bank Branch
Landmark Group announces the appointment of Jayanti Ganguly as CEO of Home Centre, India
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Categories

  • Automobile
  • Entertainment
  • E-Sports
  • Food
  • Health
  • Technology
  • LifeStyle
  • Travel

About Us

Through our news networks, we raise millions of users' awareness. We are among the world's most reputable news networks.
Quick Link
Top Categories
  • Entertainment

Subscribe US

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

AdkhabarAdkhabar
Copyright © 2021 - 2025 AdKhabar. All Rights Reserved. POWERED BY Life Care News.
Join Us!
Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news, podcasts etc..
Zero spam, Unsubscribe at any time.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?